Pros cons gay marriage
The Pros and Cons of Gay Marriage Argumentative Essay
Relationships between sexes have been traditionally streamlined into the heterosexual standards of action. Marriage, as a union of two people before the law and the church, is mostly perceived as such comprising representatives of different sexes, a man and a woman.
Get a custom essay on The Pros and Cons of Gay Marriage
Learn More
However, apart from heterosexual couples, there also emerge occurrences when two people of the matching sex desire to establish a matrimonial unit. In such cases, the phrase of same-sex marriage or gay marriage is applied whenever such union is officially recognized by the legal system of a country. The attitude to gay marriage has differed throughout the existence of humankind, varying from endorsement to indifference to persecution.
After a historical wave of human rights movement, contemporary society appears to be reconsidering its attitude to gay marriage on the whole, and a number of countries have already accepted gay marriage as legal. Despite this alter, the opposition between the proponents and the opponents of gay marriage remains tense, nurtured by a wide range of mutually exclusive argume
Pros vs Cons of Gay Marriage
The issue of whether gay and lesbian people should be allowed to be legally marry has been debated frequently in recent times as noted in the movie we watched in class on 08/17/2011. One part of the world, the right-wingers who believe that homosexuality is morally false and on the other side are gay advocates who argue that their sexual preferences shouldn’t determine whether or not they can marry. To the latter group, lgbtq+ and lesbian couples should have the same civil rights as heterosexual couples, including the right to legally marry.
Advocates for same-sex marriage purport that to reject a couple, no matter what their sexes, the right to marriage is to deny them a basic civil right. If a couple is unable to marry, they cannot access mention and federal benefits that married couples can, such as health care, visitation rights when one partner is in the hospital, shared tax benefits and social security. But the fight for equal rights to marry isn’t just about access to benefits. Gay and lesbian couples are also looking for a way to legally proclaim their love for and commitment to each other in the same public way heterosexual couples include always e
BLOG
The U.S. Supreme Court just legalized queer marriage nationwide. If same-sex couples acquire married, then they gain access to hundreds of legal and financial benefits.
They — and anybody else thinking about marrying — also bear some often-overlooked costs and responsibilities.
Even couples who contain been together for decades may be surprised by how a legal marriage changes their affair . In the eyes of the statute, couples who join go from two independent people to one economic unit.
“You’re telling the government: I will grab care of this person legally and financially if something happens to them,” said Debra Neiman, a financial planner in Arlington, Mass. She saw many clients rush to the altar when Massachusetts became the first state to recognize same-sex marriage 11 years ago, and it didn’t always work out the way they had expected.
“Just because you have the right to unite doesn’t mean you should,” Ms. Neiman said. “For people who are used to being financially independent and unencumbered, it may be hard.”
Still, the legal and financial perks of marriage attend to outweigh its costs and has
Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage
<body_text>
A large and growing body of scientific evidence indicates that the intact, married family is best for children. In particular, the work of scholars David Popenoe, Linda Waite, Maggie Gallagher, Sara McLanahan, David Blankenhorn, Paul Amato, and Alan Booth has contributed to this conclusion.
This statement from Sara McLanahan, a sociologist at Princeton University, is representative:
If we were asked to design a system for making sure that children's basic needs were met, we would probably come up with something quite similar to the two-parent optimal. Such a design, in theory, would not only ensure that children had access to the time and money of two adults, it also would provide a system of checks and balances that promoted quality parenting. The fact that both parents have a biological connection to the child would increase the likelihood that the parents would identify with the child and be willing to sacrifice for that child, and it would reduce the likelihood that either parent would abuse the child.
Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps